The case is known as In re: Domestic Drywall Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2437 and
13-MD-2437. Starting in December 2012, indirect purchasers of gypsum wallboard filed lawsuits claiming that the Defendants conspired, in violation of the federal antitrust laws, to raise, fix, maintain or stabilize the price of gypsum wallboard and, to help effectuate this price-fixing conspiracy, abolish the industry’s long-standing practice of limiting price increases for the duration of a construction project through the use of “job quotes."
In connection with the TIN and USG settlements, the Court certified identical Settlement Classes composed of all persons or entities that indirectly purchased wallboard for end use and not for resale in the United States that was manufactured or distributed by any of the Defendants or their subsidiaries from January 1, 2012 through November 30, 2014. The settlement recovers money for the benefit of class members located in or making a purchase in or from an entity located in Arizona, Arkansas, California, the District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin (“Indirect Purchaser State Damages Class”).
- CertainTeed Gypsum
- New NGC
- Lafarge North America
- Eagle Materials, Inc.
- American Gypsum Company LLC
- PABCO Building Products
Filing Deadline: January 9, 2019
To learn more about this settlement and how SRG can help you in the recovery process, please contact us:
Settlement Recovery Group, LLC (“SRG”) is not the official claims administrator, class counsel or any party in the case. SRG is a third party claims filing service that can be hired to file and track claims. We specialize in helping companies and small businesses file claims to obtain their fair share of settlement money from class action lawsuits once a settlement has been reached. Our services are voluntary and are not required to file a claim; claimants may file a no-cost claim on their own. This summary is for informational purposes only and is based on SRG’s review of publicly available case documents. Official information can be found on the case website and on the court docket. This summary is not and should not be construed as legal, tax, or other professional advice.